'Intrest throughout the three stories Essay\r'

' sherlock Holmes is the main character in the tosh, as in all the Sherlock Holmes stories. He is a real p bandr and searching man with an extraordinary gift. He is Observant and analytical person and can harbor a large amount of information from a small amount of clues, which most others would overlook. From early on in the drool Holmes does non hesitate to surface out off his detective skills when he meats Helen Stoner: â€Å"You confuse come in by train this morning, I see. I observe the second half of a return ticket in the palm of label atomic number 18 perfectly fresh.\r\n on that point is no vehicle save a dog-cart which throws up mud in that way, and then only when you sit on the leftfield side of the driver”. This shows that Holmes considers these observations to be trivial, and that they do not stretch his talent whatsoever. Doctor Watson is Holmes’ assistant. He is a fully qualified doctor and so a clever man, but next to Holmes he often epochs comes across as a clumsy, less intelligent person. This contrast gifts Holmes and Watson an interesting duo to read about. Watson is use for occasional humour during the trading floor.\r\nIt is very apparent that Watson admires Holmes: â€Å"I had no keener pleasure than in following Holmes in his professional investigations and admiring his rapid deductions”. Finally, Conan-Doyle uses Watson to put forward questions and opinions, which the reviewer may be thinking of. Holmes never openly rejects these opinions, but nor does he accept them or firmness of purpose Watson’s questions clearly. This creates red herrings, which ensure that the outcome of the story remains a riddle to the ratifier.\r\nHelen Stoner, the lady that has come to Holmes for help, is portrayed in this story as the ‘ damosel in distress’. She is in desperate study of assistance and has no one else to turn to. Whilst Helen is nerve-wracking to explain her predica workforcet to Holm es, He is very calm air and collective and does not let her tell the story in full immediately; he oftentimes asks for details or interrupts Helen. This sustains the reader interested because he or she is eager to learn the story. Holmes’ attitude towards Helen reflects the time the story was written in.\r\nHolmes is very sympathetic and refined towards Helen: â€Å"‘you mustiness not fear,’ said he soothingly, digression forward and patting her forearm. ‘We shall soon set matters right, I throw no doubt”. Holmes is not cosmos sexist in his assumption that Helen is helpless and afraid, he is merely video display the attitude towards women that was shared by most men at that time. Holmes knows that Helen needs help from someone who is calm and confident. Roylott is Helen’s stepfather. Roylott is an aggressive, violent character who threatens Holmes by deflexion his poker.\r\nRoylott is the prime suspect in the story for the reader, b ecause the demolition of his stepdaughters would mean he would receive their inheritance. Throughout the story, Conan-Doyle gives some(prenominal) clues as to the outcome of the mystery story. Firstly, when Helen is telling her story from the beginning, the reader learns that Roylott, who would inherit an amount of money in the crusade of the two sisters’ deaths, is a short-tempered, dangerous man who has a history of violence: â€Å"There was a series of disgraceful quarrels and brawls with anyone giving him the least offence”.\r\nThese clues make Roylott the prime suspect for the death of Julia Stoner. Secondly, although it leaves many questions unanswered, Helen reveals that Julia’s last words were: â€Å"Helen! It was the doughnut! The Speckled band! â€Å". It turns out that she was describing the snake that bit her. Finally, there are several important clues given in Helen’s bedroom, next to Roylott’s room, before the plot is unfolded . higher up Helen’s bed, which is fixed to the floor, is a bell rope that does not work, and a ventilator. The ventilator is in a very strange place: the dividing wall betwixt the two populate.\r\nIt turns out that these features were to allow the snake to ask to Helen. Such clues were intended to intrigue the reader and atom to the reader, giving them a chance to work the mystery out for themselves. These clues are typical of the mystery genre. There are also several red herrings in the story, for example, the gypsies living in the grounds: â€Å"It must redeem been those wretched gypsies in the plantation”. These points are opposed but raise questions in the mind of the reader, make them want to read on. Conan-Doyle also uses tension to keep the reader interested.\r\nWhen Holmes and Watson are waiting for the snake to pose in Helen’s room, they are in nighttime and speak in whispers. Holmes makes it clear to Watson that they are in considerable dang er and must not attract caught. Conan-Doyle also uses language techniques such as shorter sentences to get this tension. At the end of the story, as was common in stories of this genre, Holmes gives an explanation of the crime for the benefit of the reader. ‘The Devil’s Foot’ is similar to ‘The Speckled ringing’ in that from the start there is a character that we take on reason to suspect: Mortimer.\r\nAt first, Mortimer does not look to be as vicious an enemy as Roylott, as was common in the time the story was written, but several clues unearthed by Holmes point the flick at him. The maul in this case is also similar to the murder in ‘The Speckled Band’. It is a very horrific and mysterious murder that some in the story believe to be of a supernatural nature. Murders like this were often symbolize in stories of this time and genre and were designed to glamour and shock the reader. Holmes, however, says: â€Å"if it is beyond t his world then it is certainly beyond me”.\r\nThis makes the reader believe that there must be a logical or scientific explanation. The crime is again solved by Holmes, who solves the mystery by noticing small clues and gathering information, in this case, noticing the connectedness of combustible powder between the two rooms in which the murders took place. To support his idea of this powder being the cause of the deaths, Holmes puts his life on the line and tries it on himself. This eccentricity and willingness to go so far to solve a crime makes Holmes all the more interesting and unusual to the reader.\r\n'